COVID-19 vaccines in Spain: Population’s willingness to get vaccinated and their main concerns and misconceptions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35669/rcys.2024.14.e340Keywords:
COVID-19, Vaccines, hesitancy, fake news, scientific communication, misinformation, anti-vaccination movementAbstract
Introduction: COVID-19 has not only caused a pandemic of respiratory disease. An infodemic of false information has been reported these late months. These fakes news are particularly relevant when concerning vaccines. In this study, we intend to describe the pro and against COVID-19 vaccination populations and find the main misconceptions about COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: To do so, we surveyed a group of Spanish population on their concerns and opinions on COVID-19 vaccines. Additionally, we asked the respondents about several false beliefs on COVID-19 vaccines. Results: The results showed that most people reluctant to get vaccinated were more likely to be female, to not have health-related studies, to have a compulsory basic level of education and to not be willing to get the general vaccines suggested by their general practitioner. These people were not found, however, to be more religious, which contradicts what many other studies have demonstrated before. It was also found that most people are worried about the distribution of vaccines and that most people also want vaccines to be compulsory. The results also showed that people less willing to get vaccinated are more likely to be worried about vaccines’ safety, to believe in conspiracy theories involving vaccines and to believe in misconceptions or false beliefs. Discussion: We believe that our results show that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign faced more hesitancy than most common vaccines, and that we can affirm that the profile of those hesitant to the COVID-19 vaccination was also quite different, being less related to religiosity and much more related to misinformation spread through social media. Conclusions: We believe our study to reveal some key differences in the profiles of those hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination. We believe that this study shows that spreading a survey before any vaccine awareness campaign may provide a lot of information about the main concerns and misconceptions that the target population has, and it might allow for a much better communication strategy.
Downloads
References
Islam MS, Sarkar T, Khan SH, Mostofa Kamal A-H, Hasan SM, Kabir A, et al. COVID-19–Related Infodemic and Its Impact on Public Health: A Global Social Media Analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2020;103(4):1621–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812
Johnson NF, Velásquez N, Restrepo NJ, Leahy R, Gabriel N, El Oud S, et al. The online competition between pro-and anti-vaccination views. Nature. 2020 Jun;582: 230–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1
Yaqub O, Castle-Clarke S, Sevdalis N, Chataway J. Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review. Social Science & Medicine. 2014 Jul;112:1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.018
Dudo A, Besley JC. Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement. PLoS One. 2016 Feb;11(2): e0148867. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148867
Wlodarska A, Gujski M, Pinkas J, Raciborski F. The influence of socio-demographic characteristics on attitudes towards prophylactic vaccination in Poland. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health. 2021 Jan;34(1): 121-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01671
Rozbroj T, Lyons A, Lucke J. Psychosocial and demographic characteristics relating to vaccine attitudes in Australia. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Jan;102(1):172-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.027
Schwarzinger M, Watson V, Arwidson P, Alla F, Luchini S. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in a representative working-age population in France: a survey experiment based on vaccine characteristics. Lancet Public Health. 2021 Apr;6(4):e210-e221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00012-8
Wang J, Lu X, Lai X, Lyu Y, Zhang H, Fenghuang Y, Jing R, Li L, Yu W, Fang H. The Changing Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in Different Epidemic Phases in China: A Longitudinal Study. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Feb;9(3):191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9030191
Murphy J, Vallières F, Bentall RP, Shevlin M, McBride O, Hartman TK, et al. Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nature Communications. 2021 Jan;12(1):29-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9
Sallam M, Dababseh D, Eid H, Al-Mahzoum K, Al-Haidar A, Taim D, Yaseen A, Ababneh NA, Bakri FG, Mahafzah A. High Rates of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Its Association with Conspiracy Beliefs: A Study in Jordan and Kuwait among Other Arab Countries. Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;9(1):42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010042
Kepka D, Coronado GD, Rodriguez HP, Thompson B. Evaluation of a radionovela to promote HPV vaccine awareness and knowledge among Hispanic parents. Journal of Community Health. 2011 Dec;36(6): 957–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-011-9395-1
Eguia H, Vinciarelli F, Bosque-Prous M, Kristensen T, Saigí-Rubió F. Spain’s Hesitation at the Gates of a COVID-19 Vaccine. Vaccines. 2021;9(2):170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020170
Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas (CIS). Ministerio de Presidencia, Relación con las Cortes y Memoria Democrática. Barómetro de Mayo 2021. May 2021. Available at: http://datos.cis.es/pdf/Es3322marMT_A.pdf
Ipsos Group. Ipsos - World Economic Forum Covid 19 vaccine global survey. January 2021 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 7th June 2021]. Available from: https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2021-02/ipsos-wef_covid-19_vaccine_global_survey_january_2021_-_global_pr.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Joan Soriano Guardia, Anna Tramuns Fresnadillo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer: As of 2023, RCyS is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Articles from 2011 to 2022 are under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 License that allows copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format, remixing, transforming and building upon the material for any purpose, including commercial.
We also inform that RCyS is adhered to the Declaration of Berlin.
